Persecution, Abandonment, and Betrayal: Comments on the Reed Bates Saga

The Situation

Reed Bates's troubles began only a week and half after mine did and followed a very similar pattern. For almost a year, Reed (also known as ChipSeal; formerly of Ennis (Ellis County), Texas; currently of Dallas, Texas) has been terrorized by the Ennis Police Department and the department of Ellis County Sheriff Johnny Brown because they disapprove of his assertive cycling technique. His technique accords with both Texas law and well-established principles of cycling safety and furthermore constitutes the safest and most efficient possible cycling behavior. Not only have they repeatedly harassed him by stopping and detaining him without cause while he was traveling, and not only have they they issued him citations for violating non-existent regulations, they have gone so far as to arrest him and hold him in jail on three occasions for a total of three weeks and to charge him with the crime of reckless driving, a charge that is extremely rare even in cases where a collision occurs.

In March, he was convicted of violating the prohibition on "driv[ing] so slowly as to impede the normal and reasonable movement traffic, except when reduced speed is necessary for safe operation or in compliance with law (Texas Transportation Code §545.363)," despite the facts that no traffic was substantially impeded and that he could not reasonably have traveled any faster, in a highly flawed jury trial (recounted here by Steve Averill) that was later invalidated. The charges are still pending, and he expects to be retried. In August, he was convicted of reckless driving in a bench trial (recounted here by Steve Averill) that can only be characterized as a kangaroo court. Acccording to PM Summer, Judge A. Gene Calvert, Jr., in announcing his verdict, said: "You may be right that it is safer to ride in the middle of the lane instead of the shoulder, but it is reckless of you to do so." ("What?!" Yeah, you heard me.) So, in defiance of logic, Reed's behavior, despite being safe and legal, was nevertheless reckless and criminal. Like me, he is in a state of virtual house arrest because the danger of interference from police officers renders travel impractically dangerous for him.

Like me, Reed and his friends and supporters appealed to state and national cycling advocacy organizations for help. Neither the Texas Bicycle Coalition (BikeTexas) nor the League of American Bicyclists was willing to provide any support. In fact, it seems that many "cycling advocates", including leaders of these organizations, worked to conceal and obscure the issue: to spread false information about it so as to cast suspicion on Reed's cycling behavior, legal decisions, credibility, and even sanity and to downplay the merits of his case and the severity of the consequences of it to him and to cycling in general. Having no connection to Texas myself, I do not closely monitor BikeTexas's activities. However, I do know that the League did not even publicize his ordeal (or mine for that matter) to aid him in gathering support from other cycling advocates. This would have been the least it could have done for him, but it should have done much more. It should have treated Reed's experience as a crisis of the greatest magnitude, a potential catastrophe for cyclists throughout the country. It should have helped him collect money for legal fees. It should have supplied him with an expert witness on cycling safety as he specifically asked for. It should have called on everyone who had any influence: law enforcers, politicians, bureaucrats, journalists, cycling advocates, civil rights advocates, League members, cyclists. It should have made a strong and clear statement of righteous indignation at Reed's treatment. It should have constructed and executed a plan to mobilize and coordinate support. But it did none of this.

After Reed's conviction of reckless driving, the frustration of his friends and supporters expressed to the League and particularly to its president, Andy Clarke, grew to such a level that the League's leaders felt compelled to comment publicly on the issue. Andy Clarke posted a letter on the League's blog. I recommend that you read this letter as well the comments made by PM Summer (Clearly Unhelpful) and Keri Caffrey (Who Will Speak Up When They Come For You?) on their respective blogs. PM and Keri express many of my thoughts quite well. However, I have many thoughts and feelings about this situation that others have not yet expressed to my satisfaction. I attempt to express there here.

I hoped that this article would be more timely, but it took a while to collect and organize my thoughts and to choose my words so as to express my thoughts clearly, precisely, and thoroughly. I found the heap of issues, facts, and opinions and the wall of hateful and anti-rational rhetoric so overwhelming that I eventually gave up on the "thorough" part. I settled on making a few points about Andy's letter. In the process, I did compile an extensive index of articles that I have included at the end.

My Thoughts

As PM explains, Andy makes the following false claims in his letter.
  • For his first trial, Reed freely decided to be tried by a jury in defiance of others' better judgement. (In fact, he was pressured into it by a judge. He did not have an attorney to advise him and advocate for him in court at the time, being unable to afford one.)
  • The League has been in close contact with Reed and has been monitoring the case.
  • The road on which Reed was cited had a "perfectly rideable shoulder". (In fact, the shoulder was in relatively poor condition. Its surface was covered with sand, gravel, cracks, patches, and a rumple strip, and its width varied erratically, in some places being very narrow.)
  • Reed insisted on arguing at trial, in regard to his position on the road, that "that’s where he and everyone else should be riding," rather than restrict his arguments to the position that his behavior was entirely legal.
  • The League offered to help Reed with his case under the condition that he restrict his arguments in court to those concerning the law, but Reed refused to abide by the condition.
Andy also implies that Reed's failure to appear in court when summoned was due entirely to Reed's negligence and not to any factors beyond his control (like, for example, his attorney not being notified and his mail not being forwarded as he expected. He makes the following insidious implications as well, and other "cycling advocates" have even explicitly stated them).
  • Reed's position on the road was unreasonable.
  • Reed's concern about the hazards and impediments of riding on the shoulder were unreasonable.
  • Reed's position on proper cycling technique is unreasonable.
  • Reed was rudely and severely inconveniencing other drivers.
  • Reed was deliberately provoking the police
  • The merits of Reed's case are weak.
  • The consequences of the case to Reed are not very serious.
  • The consequences of the case to all cyclists in Texas are not very serious.
  • The consequences of the case to all cyclists in this country are not very serious.
  • The consequences to all cyclists in this country of the refusal of the League and other "cycling advocates" and advocacy organizations to support Reed are not very serious.
ALL OF THESE CLAIMS AND IMPLICATIONS ARE WRONG. Reed's behavior was entirely safe and legal. In a court of law, one in which decisions are actually based on law and reason rather than prejudice and ignorance, Reed's case is rock solid. He did nothing to inconvenience or provoke anyone. His only crime was refusing to show sufficient deference, to prostrate himself before the motorists on that road. At the risk of being insensitive to another group of people who have suffered discrimination, I think that Reed's crime can best be characterized as "being uppity".

Regardless of the condition of the specific shoulder in question (which, contrary to Andy's claim, was extremely poor), I strongly object to any characterization of a "perfectly rideable shoulder". Riding on a shoulder ALWAYS imposes hazards and impediments beyond those of riding on the road proper (unless the road proper contains a specific exceptional hazard or impediment). Sometimes those hazards and impediments are unreasonably high. Sometimes they are low enough that riding on the shoulder could be considered okay. I myself sometimes ride on the shoulder, albeit very rarely, on some occasions when I deem the risk and inconvenience to be low. However, it I find it extremely offensive and threatening that a police officer or Andy Clarke or anyone else would deign to decide what is an acceptable risk or inconvenience for me or Reed or anyone else to accept, and that is exactly what is done by characterizing a shoulder as "perfectly rideable". The condition of a shoulder can be bad or not so bad but can almost never be such that there is no advantage to avoiding it.

From what I have read, I believe that I would insist on taking the same, middle-of-the-lane, position as Reed did on that road and would strongly advise others to do so as well, assuming that my current impression of the road is verified by direct observation. I would eagerly defend my reasons in a civil and rational manner with anyone who would engage me in a discussion in the same manner. I would willingly consider contrary opinions as well, if presented in a civil and rational manner. I strive to convince, not to confuse or coerce. I would never attempt to prevent another cyclist from exercising his or her own judgement. To do so would be manipulative and controlling and would likely lead the cyclist to make worse decisions, since I would be pressuring him or her not to think for him- or herself. I would never be satisfied to passively allow another cyclist to suffer arbitrary punishment for exercising his or her judgement, even if I disagreed with that judgement. To do otherwise would be weak and dishonorable. To undermine the freedom of a cyclist to exercise his or her own judgement, whether actively or passively, would undermine the cause of cycling advocacy and the pursuit of a free and just society.

No one should be permitted to scrutinize and micromanage a cyclist's lane position. Very few police officers have the expertise to properly evaluate the merits of taking different lane positions on a given road. Neither can someone who has never traveled on a particular road competently evaluate the merits of different lane positions on that road. It would be a detriment to all cyclists to set a precedent of allowing politicians, police officers, judges, or jurors to scrutinize and micromanage a cyclist's position on the road. No one is subject to such intense scrutiny and control when driving a vehicle of any other type. How can anyone accept the idea of being always vulnerable to imprisonment for not being in the exact position that someone else thinks is appropriate? It is unacceptable that cyclists currently receive inferior treatment under the law, and it is unacceptable that those who claim to advocate for cyclists accept and even defend this treatment.

Even for those cyclists who would have preferred riding on this particular shoulder, a bad outcome to this case could leave Texas law in
a limbo where a cyclist would have no way to know whether an attempt to avoid a hazard or impediment (even one that would be widely recognized) could deliver him or her into legal hell. (Limbo? Hell? Get it?) He or she could only cycle with the constant fear of a police officer stopping him or her and ordering him or her to change positions or change routes or even just go back home and stay there (as I was ordered by Joseph Reed shortly after he had arrested me).

And YOU MUST DISTINGUISH between the danger of being stopped and possibly cited for violating traffic regulations and the danger of being arrested and/or charged with committing crimes. If Reed had not been arrested and had not been charged with reckless driving, we would not be having this conversation. As someone who is currently in the aforementioned hell myself, I admonish everyone reading this not to take the possibility lightly. Do not underestimate the impact on a person's life, and do not assume that it cannot happen to you! I have never been a risk-taker. I had never had trouble with the law before this. I did not at all anticipate what happened to me. Trouble can find you just as easily as it found me (in the state whose Declaration of Rights precedes the founding of this country).

And who will support you if and when it does happen to you? After all, that is what we expect cycling advocates and advocacy organizations to do. An organization that would readily abandon any one of its charges in a time of need would readily abandon any other as well, and that includes YOU. That is why, for example, free speech advocates must vigorously defend even offensive speech: because you never know when your speech, which you consider innocent or even righteous, will be tagged as offensive by those with the authority do so. This case has the potential to set a dangerous legal precedent of allowing police officers to arbitrarily order someone off of the road and to use the courts to arbitrarily punish them for refusing. But the attitudes and actions of cycling advocates and advocacy organizations has the potential to set another precedent, not a legal one but a political and social one: that cyclists cannot rely on each other for help when they desperately need it. There seems to have been a recent surge in cases of illegal persecution of cyclists by police officers and judges. There also seems to have been a recent surge in anti-cycling legislation throughout the country that goes beyond the long standing anti-cycling laws that also exist in some form throughout the country. I believe that the outcome of Reed's case will be influential in encouraging or discouraging this discrimination. The League of American Bicyclists has been silent and passive in the face of even the most aggregious discrimination.

Personally, I would very much like to see vehicular cycling principles put on public record. Those principles should be viewed as critical to
all of us, and they are just as much on trial in this case as Reed himself. That is the crux of the reckless driving charge. Reed was taking the safest possible position. The prosecution is claiming that he was taking an unnecessarily dangerous position. Regardless of whether some arbitrary person believes that the additional risk of riding on the shoulder is acceptably low, it is important to acknowledge that Reed's position was entirely safe, that it was safer than the shoulder, and that, regardless of how small the difference might be, the law and its agents should not be permitted to force anyone to accept that additional risk. The advantage or disadvantage to Reed's case of arguing about cycling safety principles should be evaluated by a skilled attorney who is familiar with the particular court and who understands and appreciates Reed's position. It is one thing for such an attorney to criticize Reed's proposed strategy and another thing for someone else to do so without the proper skill, experience, and understanding.

Andy and others have also failed to acknowledge the fact that someone, like Reed (and me), who cycles as a primary mode of transportation cannot afford to make decisions and movements as frequently as a recreation or sport cyclist might expect. Recreation and sport cyclists can afford to take long and indirect routes. They can afford to travel only in good weather and good spirits. Recreation cyclists can afford to travel very slowly. Sport cyclists can accept maintaining a hyper-alert state while cycling because challenge and thrills are a welcome part of sports. An ordinary traveler, who must travel in all conditions, internal and external, who just needs to get somewhere with a minimal expenditure of time and energy cannot afford the burdens of delay, effort, stress, danger, unreliability, and inflexibility that many others are willing to accept. A transportation cyclist must establish reliable habits and policies so that he or she can avoid unnecessary decisions and movements. This is taken for granted with regard to travel by vehicles of other types, such as cars and motorcycles. Anyone who would travel in a timid manner, as many expect Reed to have done, day after day, rain or shine, light or dark, hot or cold, on familiar or unfamiliar roads, while tired, while upset, while stressed out, while preoccupied, needing to preserve the energy, physical AND mental, to perform some task at his or her destination that might be difficult or unpleasant or stressful and still have the time and energy to get back home and eat dinner and get to bed so that he or she could get up in the morning and have a day, then he or she would quickly find his or her life to be hopelessly difficult or severely limited. There are only so many decisions a person can make in a day. There is only so much of the day a person can maintain an athletic level of alertness. Many people adapt to the expectation of timidity (what John Forester has dubbed the "cyclist inferiority complex") by either giving up cycling as a practical form of transportation or imposing severe constraints on their lives to make timid cycling practical. If motorists had to follow these expectations, you would quickly see either an surge of collisions beyond imagination or you would see about as many motorists on the road as you see cyclists now.

Me and Reed were not the first cyclists to be bullied off of the road by police officers. There have been many others. In some cases, cyclists have even been physically attacked by police officers. I hear those more experienced than me that there was time when cycling advocates were thoughtful, passionate, and loyal defenders of the right to travel freely, who would rally together to defend against these attacks. I have hope that this thoughtfulness, passion, and loyalty can be rejuvenated and that the right to travel freely can be reaffirmed.

Resources

Structured Websites

Blogs

Articles

When I first tried to write this article, I became overwhelmed by the tangled rat's nest of issues involved and the ocean of text that those issue were hidden in. (Please forgive the mixed metaphor.) I began compiling this list of articles, with the intention that it be a comprehensive archive of information on Reed Bates's saga, so that I could sort sort out the overwhelming heap of facts and opinions in preparation for my article. However, I could not decide on a standard for an article to be considered related this saga. I decided to err on the side inclusion. That is why the list is so long. That is also why I needed to classify the articles by topic as well. Please let me know if you know of any articles or other resources are not currently included in this list but that seem to belong on it. If you are the creator of this resource, please don't be modest.

DATE TOPICS SOURCE TITLE AND LINK
  Discrimination
Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Technical Info

Cyclist Inferiority

Traffic Safety Bicycling Matters High Speed Bicycling

Traffic Safety LAB Reform Why Cyclists Should Stay Out of the Gutter

Cycling Education Cyclist View Integrated Traffic CyclingTM Introduction

Status Update Reforming Bicycle Traffic Laws The Trials of Reed (Chipseal) Bates
09/26/2001 Traffic Safety, Traffic Law, Discrimination, Education
North Carolina Coalition for Bicycle Driving The Science and Politics of Bicycle Driving
04/20/2006 Traffic Law, Discrimination VeloNews Legally Speaking – with Bob Mionske: To impede or not to impede, that is the question
07/25/2007
Police Encounter
Eyeteeth: A journal of incisive ideas
Cyclist tasered for riding bike at MSP airport
11/11/2007
Traffic Safety, Traffic Law
Bicycling is Better
How Wide is a "Share-able" Lane?
12/31/2007 Letter, Cycling Advocacy, Traffic Safety Bicycling Traffic Engineer Bicyclists and the basic speed law
01/29/2008
Police Encounter
ChicoER
Bicyclist tased when he runs for minor infraction
06/11/2008
Police Encounter
BikePortland
Man on a bike is tackled, then tasered by Portland Police
10/04/2008 Cycling Education CommuteOrlando Take the Red Pill
02/04/2009
Police Encounter
CommuteOrlando
Impeding Traffic
02/17/2009
Police Encounter
CommuteOrlando
Impeding Traffic: The Audio
04/22/2009
Police Encounter, Legal Analysis, Status Update
Road Rights
When the Cop Says Stop
04/23/2009
Repost, Police Encounter, Legal Analysis, Status Update Windermere Roadies
Road Rights: The Right to Disobey Cops
04/27/2009
Cycling Advocacy, Cycling Education, Discrimination, Traffic Safety
CommuteOrlando
Police Have it Wrong: Traffic Flow vs. Safety
04/29/2009
Commentary
Road Rights
A “Cop” Responds
05/06/2009 Traffic Law
Bicycling is Better Impeding Traffic Is…
05/13/2009
Commentary
BicycleLaw
"And the hell with the law"
05/19/2009
Discrimination
CommuteOrlando
New Frames for New Ages
08/03/2009
Traffic Law
North Texas Vehicular Cyclist
Impediment
08/04/2009 Discrimination
CommuteOrlando
The Culture of Speed vs the Culture of Trust
08/10/2009
Traffic Law
STEVE MAGAS BIKE LAWYER
BIKE LAW 101 – An Overview of Bike Law
08/25/2009
Traffic Safety, Discrimination
Bicycling is Better
Give and Take; Control and Release
09/24/2009
Status Update
Ironton Tribune
Tasered biker sues in civil rights case
09/25/2009
Status Update
STEVE MAGAS BIKE LAWYER
Ironton Tribune reports on Tasered Cyclist case
10/01/2009 Police Encounter ChipSeal Nice Meeting You, Officer Watson
10/01/2009
Cycling Advocacy
Bicycling is Better Which Cycling Politics: Doom or Possibility?
10/10/2009
Police Encounter
NEWS5
Teen’s Death Prompts Taser Ban
11/19/2008 Cycling Education CommuteOrlando Adventures in Traffic: College Park to OIA
08/25/2009 Discrimination, Cycling Education Bicycling is Better Give and Take; Control and Release
10/04/2009 Police Encounter, Legal Analysis ChipSeal It Is More Important To Me Than to Them
10/06/2009 Discrimination DFW Point-to-Point Steve Does Principles
10/20/2009 Traffic Safety DFW Point-to-Point God Bless Potholes
11/15/2009 Traffic Safety ChipSeal The Steps of the Dance
11/16/2009 Traffic Safety CommuteOrlando A very fine essay…
11/30/2009 Traffic Law ChipSeal Slow Vehicles and Lawful Lane Position
12/09/2009
Status Update, Discrimination
STEVE MAGAS BIKE LAWYER
TASERED Cyclists – An Update
12/15/2009 Traffic Safety ChipSeal MOTORISTS NEVER THINK
12/18/2009 Police Encounter ChipSeal It Is Hard To Plan For Traffic Stops
12/18/2009 Repost, Traffic Safety cycleSMARTdallas Motorists never think
12/23/2009 Legal Analysis ChipSeal Oops!
12/24/2009 Cycling Education CommuteOrlando Book Review: CycleCraft, by John Franklin
01/01/2010 Discrimination, Cycling Education Bicycling is Better The Conch Republic Battles the Tyranny of Speed
01/06/2010 Traffic Safety cycleSMARTdallas Why Shoulders Make Bad Bike Lanes
01/09/2010 Cycling Education DFW Point-to-Point For Family and For Law
01/19/2010 Police Encounter ChipSeal While Minding My Own Business...
01/22/2010 Police Encounter ChipSeal Perilous Journey
01/23/2010 Police Encounter ChipSeal You Are Under Arrest!
01/24/2010 Police Encounter ChipSeal Nice Meeting You Again, Officer Watson!
01/25/2010 Police Encounter ChipSeal A Tale of Two Jails
01/26/2010 Commentary ChipSeal Repercussions
01/26/2010 Discrimination CommuteOrlando The Enforcement of Imaginary Laws
01/27/2010 Discrimination dailybreeze LA council studies ways of protecting bicyclists
01/28/2010
Traffic Law
STEVE MAGAS BIKE LAWYER
OHIO’S BIKE LAWS
01/28/2010 Discrimination DFW Point-to-Point It Starts With the Law
02/02/2010 Comment Feedback ChipSeal Back-talk
02/03/2010 Court Appearance ChipSeal A letter came in the mail.
02/04/2010 Status Update ChipSeal Court Date
02/05/2010 Traffic Safety CommuteOrlando Mythbusters on Highway 535
02/06/2010 Repost, Traffic Safety cycleSMARTdallas For Ennis the Menace
02/10/2010 Status Update ChipSeal Correction
02/12/2010 Status Update ChipSeal Ellis County Demands a Public Showdown
02/13/2010 Inspiration DFW Point-to-Point Inspiration and Fear
02/14/2010 Status Update DFW Point-to-Point New Case
02/14/2010 Commentary DFW Point-to-Point What Have We Come To?
02/15/2010 Status Update DFW Point-to-Point Scarlet Pimpernel
02/16/2010 Status Update, Police Encounter, Traffic Safety, Commentary ChipSeal Sometimes Motorists Do the Darndest Things
02/16/2010 Status Update DFW Point-to-Point High Noon
02/16/2010 Status Update cycleSMARTdallas ChipSeal
02/17/2010 Court Appearance, Commentary, Status Update DFW Point-to-Point Looking Back Looking Forward
02/19/2010 Comment Feedback, Traffic Safety ChipSeal My Formal Reply To Larry
02/19/2010 Traffic Safety, Legal Analysis DFW Point-to-Point Fine Lines and Smart Riding
02/20/2010 Traffic Law DFW Point-to-Point Daily Violation
02/22/2010 Traffic Safety DFW Point-to-Point Things to Think About From a Different Direction
02/23/2010 Status Update, Legal Analysis cycleSMARTdallas In a nutshell
02/24/2010 Traffic Safety DFW Point-to-Point This is Going Somewhere
02/25/2010
Police Encounter, Court Appearance, Legal Analysis, Commentary
STEVE MAGAS BIKE LAWYER
TROTWOOD v. SELZ – A GREAT VICTORY FOR CYCLISTS
02/28/2010 Police Encounter cycleSMARTdallas ECSI: Ennis Crime Scene Investigator
03/01/2010 Legal Analysis, Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas 30 MPH. Think about it.
03/01/2010 Cycling Education CommuteOrlando The Dance on Video
03/02/2010 Discrimination, Inspiration cycleSMARTdallas First they ticketed...
03/02/2010 Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas Should these police officers ticket themselves for impeding traffic?
03/02/2010 Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas Crime Watch.
03/02/2010 Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas What does "share" mean to you?
03/05/2010 Traffic Safety cycleSMARTdallas The American Association of State Highway and Traffic Officials comes to ChipSeal's defense.
03/06/2010 Cycling Advocacy
Bicycling is Better A New Myth for Cycling
03/07/2010 Fundraising cycleSMARTdallas Special New Higher Prices in the Cycle*Dallas Gift Shop!
03/08/2010  Cycling Advocacy
Bicycling is Better Blue Collar Jedi Cyclist
03/08/2010 Fundraising, Commentary CommuteOrlando Let Him Ride
03/08/2010 Commentary, Status Update DFW Point-to-Point Some Battles Choose Us
03/09/2010 Fundraising cycleSMARTdallas Save the baby ChipSeals! Look to the right... and donate
03/09/2010 Police Encounter
CYCLES The Hadley Encounters
03/09/2010 Police Encounter CYCLES The West Springfield Encounters
03/09/2010 Legal Analysis CYCLES The Police Report
03/09/2010 Legal Analysis CYCLES Laws that are Relevant to My Situation
03/09/2010 Court Appearance CYCLES The Court Appearance
03/09/2010 Status Update CYCLES The Attorney General
03/09/2010 Status Update,Discrimination CYCLES Bill Newman
03/09/2010 Status Update CYCLES Letters to the Chiefs of Police
03/09/2010 Traffic Safety, Comment Feedback CYCLES Questions and Answers on Vecular Cycling / Bicycle Driving
03/09/2010 Traffic Law, Traffic Safety CYCLES The Need for Cyclists to Use Assertive Lane Position
03/09/2010 Cycling Education, Discrimination CYCLES Advice for Cyclists when Stopped by the Police
03/09/2010 Comment Feedback CYCLES Other Comments from the Facebook Note "my legal troubles".
03/09/2010 Discrimination CYCLES The Right to Travel
03/09/2010 Fundraising DFW Point-to-Point Bare Bones Night
03/10/2010 Cycling Education CYCLES Frequently Asked Questions about Bicycle Driving
03/10/2010 Status Update, Traffic Law, Commentary cycleSMARTdallas BULLETIN!!!
03/10/2010 Repost, Fundraising, Commentary BikeForums ChipSeal needs our support
03/10/2010 Letter cycleSMARTdallas Contacts
03/11/2010 Contacts cycleSMARTdallas Pen Pals
03/12/2010 Comment Feedback cycleSMARTdallas What they are saying...
03/13/2010 Police Encounter ChipSeal First, Stop Digging
03/13/2010 Status Update DFW Point-to-Point ChipSeal/Reed Bates Update
03/13/2010 Legal Analysis DFW Point-to-Point A Way Out for Ennis
03/15/2010 Cycling Education DFW Point-to-Point Birth of a Yeti
03/17/2010 Fundraising cycleSMARTdallas Attention shoppers! Save ChipSeal, not money (bump).
03/17/2010 Inspiration cycleSMARTdallas Oooo! I like that quote.
03/17/2010 Legal Analysis, Traffic Safety cycleSMARTdallas Why doesn't he operate on the shoulder?
03/19/2010 Inspiration cycleSMARTdallas Franz Kafka goes to Ennis looking for a Kolache...
03/19/2010 Link, Status Update HOW WE DRIVE Kafka in Texas
03/21/2010 Police Encounter CYCLES The Third Hadley Encounter: Relapse
03/22/2010 Police Encounter ChipSeal Impede Traffic, Pull Over a Cyclists!
03/22/2010 Court Appearance DFW Point-to-Point People Versus Bates
03/23/2010 Link, Court Appearance cycleSMARTdallas The People vs. Bates
03/23/2010 Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas Why do cyclists eat their own?
03/24/2010 Traffic Law, Traffic Safety, Cycling Education, Comment Feedback CYCLES Response to Maureen's Comment
03/24/2010 Traffic Law, Traffic Safety, Cycling Education, Letter CYCLES Letter to Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood
03/24/2010 Discrimination CommuteOrlando Another traffic/delay reality check
03/25/2010 Inspiration cycleSMARTdallas Welcome back.
03/26/2010 Traffic Safety cycleSMARTdallas Why lane position is important, and how it works.
03/26/2010 Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas Impeding traffic?
03/27/2010 Traffic Safety DFW Point-to-Point Looks Like a Sideswipe Weekend — Sigh
03/27/2010 Traffic Safety DFW Point-to-Point Go Steady Yeti
03/27/2010 Legal Analysis, Traffic Safety cycleSMARTdallas Absolutely, positively, not representative of the normal and reasonable (but variable) shoulder conditions of Highway 287 between Ennis and Waxahachie
03/29/2010 Status Update cycleSMARTdallas Ellis County has decided the charge (not to be confused with the City of Ennis)
03/29/2010 Discrimination, Fundraising cycleSMARTdallas Back to Basics regarding why Reed Bates matters to you.
03/30/2010 Commentary, Legal Analysis Bicycling is Better Thoughts About Reed Bates
03/30/2010 Link, Commentary, Legal Analysis cycleSMARTdallas Mighk makes right (sense)
03/31/2010 Inspiration, Discrimination ChipSeal What Codger Said
04/01/2010 Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas Separate but equal.
04/02/2010 Traffic Safety DFW Point-to-Point Cyclist Choice
04/02/2010 Status Update, Legal Analysis CYCLES Charged with Disorderly Conduct and Unlawful Wiretapping
04/06/2010 Link, Cycling Advocacy Tulsa Alternative Transportation Examiner The League of American Bicyclists misses the point
04/06/2010 Cycling Advocacy cycleSMARTdallas Red Dirt truth.
04/07/2010 Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas A reminder.
04/07/2010 Status Update ChipSeal Local Road Work
04/07/2010 Discrimination, Cycling Education, Comment Feedback CYCLES Response to Racerx's Comment
04/08/2010 Link, Traffic Safety cycleSMARTdallas Why the gutter is a bad place to hang out.
04/15/2010 Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas Is this legal?
04/19/2010 Traffic Safety ChipSeal Sign, Sign, Everywhere a Sign
04/20/2010 Cycling Advocacy cycleSMARTdallas Oh me oh my oh, look at Miss Ohio!
04/23/2010 Traffic Law ChipSeal Part of Chapter 13 of the Texas Driver Handbook
04/25/2010 Traffic Law, Traffic Safety ChipSeal Bicycle Rules For Motorists TDH
04/07/2010 Court Appearance CYCLES The Arraignment
04/27/2010 Traffic Safety
STREETSBLOG Tom Vanderbilt Talks “Traffic”
04/27/2010 Cycling Education DFW Point-to-Point Follow Up Report on Yetiness
04/29/2010
CommuteOrlando A good discussion of traffic culture & justice
05/04/2010 Traffic Safety, Discrimination DFW Point-to-Point Shoulders Make a WORLD of Difference
05/23/2010 Commentary DFW Point-to-Point Discretion and Valor
05/27/2010 Traffic Safety DFW Point-to-Point The Dark Side of the Land Rover Rule
06/12/2010 Discrimination, Status Update CYCLES Undue Process of Law
06/24/2010 Inspiration CommuteOrlando Accept No Limitations
06/25/2010 Cycling Education cycleSMARTdallas Readers write rightly.
06/25/2010 Status Update DFW Point-to-Point Beyond the Pale
06/26/2010 Discrimination, Status Update cycleSMARTdallas Cow Creek Country Classic Justice
06/26/2010 Status Update DFW Point-to-Point First Order of Business
06/26/2010 Police Encounter DFW Point-to-Point Historic Waxahachie
06/28/2010 Cycling Education CommuteOrlando CyclingSavvy Website Launched
06/30/2010 Discrimination CommuteOrlando Promote a healthy community, or pander to the sentiments which destroy community?
07/14/2010 Status Update cycleSMARTdallas An open letter from Reed Bates.
07/14/2010 Status Update, Traffic Safety Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas Take your lane, or risk this.
07/15/2010 Traffic Safety, Cycling Education CommuteOrlando Stop the madness! We can do so much better.
07/17/2010
Status Update
STEVE MAGAS BIKE LAWYER
TASERED CYCLIST SETTLES CIVIL RIGHTS LAWSUIT
07/20/2010 Status Update ChipSeal Trial Date Changed From July 29
07/22/2010 Cycling Education, Traffic Safety, Discrimination CommuteOrlando Trust and the "Substandard" Lane
07/23/2010 Cycling Education Orlando Sentinel Bicyclists, motorists: Can't we all get along on the roads?
07/23/2010 Link, Cycling Education cycleSMARTdallas Integration vs. segregation.
07/23/2010 Inspiration cycleSMARTdallas Don't be a "traffic cockroach".
07/24/2010 Cycling Advocacy, Traffic Safety, Cycling Education cycleSMARTdallas Why doesn't he ride on the shoulder?
07/28/2010 Status Update ChipSeal New Trial Date Set
07/29/2010 Status Update, Inspiration, Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas Ellis Country has set a NEW court date for Reed Bates.
07/30/2010 Traffic Law cycleSMARTdallas This is interesting...
08/04/2010 Link, Cycling Education cycleSMARTdallas Orlando-area bike advocate wants to share roads with cars
08/11/2010 Cycling Education, Traffic Safety cycleSMARTdallas Would you like to be the new marshal of Dodge?
08/11/2010 Status Update CYCLES Case Update: A Distant End in Sight, or at Least a Middle
08/13/2010 Link, Cycling Education cycleSMARTdallas Something old, something new. Something borrowed, something true.
08/17/2010 Status Update DFW Point-to-Point Conduct Lawful and Admirable
08/18/2010 Status Update, Legal Analysis, Fundraising cycleSMARTdallas Reed Bates found Guilty of 'Reckless Driving'
08/18/2010 Court Appearance DFW Point-to-Point People Versus Bates
08/19/2010 Repost, Status Update, Legal Analysis, Fundraising Baltimore Spokes Reed Bates found Guilty of 'Reckless Driving'
08/19/2010 Status Update STREETSBLOG NETWORK Texas Judge Deems Cyclist Guilty for Riding on the Road
08/19/2010 Link, Court Appearance BikeForums Jailed for riding in accordance with the law
08/19/2010 Cycling Advocacy, Status Update LEAGUE OF AMERICAN BICYCLISTS Picking Your Battles: The League & The Reed Bates Case
08/20/2010 Repost, Cycling Advocacy, Status Update BikeForums LAB vrs Strict VC... the Reed Bates issue.
08/20/2010 Cycling Advocacy, Discrimination cycleSMARTdallas Clearly unhelpful.
08/20/2010 Cycling Advocacy, Discrimination CommuteOrlando Who will speak up when they come for you?
08/22/2010 Status Update WashCycle Cyclist Found Guilty for Riding in the Road
08/29/2010 Police Encounter CYCLES My Encounter with Eric Perkins and Adam Bartlett
08/312010
Status Update, Discrimination, Cycling Advocacy
CYCLES
Persecution, Abandonment, and Betrayal: Comments on the Reed Bates Saga
09/01/2010
Police Encounter, Commentary, Court Appearance, Legal Analysis
STEVE MAGAS BIKE LAWYER
The SELZ Case – Revisited
09/10/2010 Commentary Road Rights Listen, Obey—and then Act
09/26/2010
Traffic Law, Discrimination, Cycling Advocacy
STEVE MAGAS BIKE LAWYER
“SHARE THE ROAD” Stinks…
10/01/2010 Discrimination, Traffic Safety, Cycling Advocacy CommuteOrlando
The Cost of Being Different
 
Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 9/1/2010 12:15:48 AM angela g wrote:
    one thing i have always agreed on: "free speech advocates must vigorously defend even offensive speech" i may not agree with what someone says, but i will agree with their your right to say it.
    i'm so sorry that cycling groups are not being more helpful in either of your cases.
    best of luck
    Reply to this
  • 9/1/2010 12:18:01 PM Ryan wrote:
    Eli:

    Olympic cyclist-turned-lawyer Bob Mionske has a blog dedicated to cycling and the law. This might make a good addition to your list.
    http://bicycling.com/blogs/roadrights/

    My own blog features helmet cam videos of my encounters with motorists in Ludlow, Springfield, and Wilbraham as a bicycle commuter.

    One of my videos helped the Ludlow Police Department locate and file felony charges against a motorist who shot me with a pellet gun while I was taking a lane. (See my blog for more details.) I get a lot of grief from motorists but this is the first time anyone has answered for what they've done.

    My encounter with the Ludlow Police Department was extremely positive. The officers I worked with commented on a cyclist's right to the road (I never had to mention it), took the incident seriously, and followed up until they caught the shooter.

    The rest of my blog shows recent examples of a right hook, left hook, buzzes, squeezes, tailgating, and various other oddities and hazards.

    My blog is http://www.cranks-on-cam.com

    -Ryan
    Reply to this
    1. 9/1/2010 7:43:11 PM Eli Damon wrote:
      Hi Ryan. Thanks for the links. By the way, what do you think that camera? I considered that kind when I was shopping for one but decided against it.
      Reply to this
      1. 9/2/2010 2:32:16 PM Ryan wrote:
        Eli:

        The camera is a Drift Innovation X170. I researched many different cameras (and found your blog in the process) and decided the X170 was the best compromise between features and price.

        I'm a bit more informed after three months of experience with the camera and feel like I got what I expected. It's very good but not excellent.

        Pros:
        1. The camera is lightweight. It feels like styrofoam in my hands.
        2. The built-in LCD allows playback anytime and helps line up shots.
        3. Runs on inexpensive AA batteries. I get 4 hours from two AA Energizer Lithium Ion rechargeables.
        5. Wireless remote lets you start and stop shooting without fumbling on top of your helmet or dismounting the camera to find buttons.
        6. I pedaled several miles through a rainstorm and the camera kept working.
        7. The field of view is 170 degrees wide so it captures peripheral vision. The plus side is that I get nearly everything in front and beside. The downside is the slight fish-eye effect in the center of the image makes objects seem more distant than they actually are.

        Cons:
        1. The picture quality is good for action but not detail. Video shot 10 feet from a car rarely reveals a license plate clearly.
        2. The camera randomly stops and restarts itself sometimes during an attempted continuous shoot. A 20-minute video might actually come out as two files of 10 minutes each, minus several seconds in between. The camera sometimes will freeze up, too, for no reason I can see. I have missed two important shots because of the problems and my confidence in the camera is a bit lower now.
        3. The microphone picks up a continuous 'buffeting wind' sound at low speeds and a 'whistling wind' at 20 miles per hour. The background noise obscures all except medium-loud sounds like engines and voices. The sound input settings are low, medium, and high. A 'No Sound' option would be the best choice.
        4. The camera has no night vision so you need a secondary light source.

        Note:
        Drift released a new high-definition version of the same camera, the HD170, which addresses many of these problems. I'm considering getting the HD170 and mounting the X170 under my seat post facing back at the lane behind me.

        -Ryan
        Reply to this
  • 9/3/2010 7:02:29 PM Eli Damon wrote:
    Mine is an Oregon Scientific ATC5K. It has a lot of the same pros and cons as you mentioned. Using standard (AA) batteries was a very important feature to me. That and the low price were the main reasons I chose it. But the image and sound quality, the interface, and the recording options do leave much to be desired.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.